Nákupní příručky

What Should Be Included in a Smart Lock RFQ?

Autor: Natlo Hardware Editorial Team·Publikováno 2026-10-21·Aktualizováno 2026-10-21·9 min read

Quick Answer

A smart lock RFQ should list the mechanism type, the coding and reset process, the ISO/TC 136 test evidence, the order quantity and MOQ, the packaging and the target-market mark, plus a reference sample. Treat the RFQ as the single document every supplier quotes against, so the quotes are like-for-like and the lock you approve is the lock that ships. Start the RFQ from a known catalogue such as the Natlo furniture locks range, then attach the smart furniture lock specification you already wrote so suppliers quote the same values.

Key Takeaways

  • List the mechanism type and the coding or reset process, not a photo, so suppliers quote the same lock.
  • Name the ISO/TC 136 test evidence and require the cycle-life or finish report in the RFQ.
  • Attach the written specification and a reference sample so the quote matches the approved lock.
  • Quote quantity, MOQ, packaging and Incoterms together, because each blank becomes a guess.
  • Compare suppliers on the supplier shortlist after the quotes return.

Which Fields Belong in a Smart Lock RFQ?

Put eight fields on the RFQ cover so the comparison is mechanical. The first is the mechanism type, written as a code such as the touch keypad combination lock CHG054 or the electronic combination lock CHE-042, never a picture. The second is the coding and the user-reset process; the third is the finish and colour code; the fourth is the order quantity and the MOQ; the fifth is the packaging; the sixth is the target-market mark; the seventh is the sample requirement; the eighth is the delivery term. The furniture hardware RFQ checklist carries the same field discipline for every hardware category, so copy its layout and add the lock columns.

Write the values the supplier must match, not the values you hope for. If the lock is a touch keypad with a four-to-eight digit code and a manager-reset function, put that in the RFQ, because a supplier that quotes against a vague line will ship a lock the user cannot reset. The smart furniture lock specification guide lists the exact values per lock, so paste those values into the RFQ and require the quote to echo them back. A quote that cannot repeat your numbers is a quote you cannot buy against.

How Do You Specify the Coding and Test Standard in the RFQ?

Furniture hardware test methods, including cycle-life and finish testing for locks, sit within the scope of ISO/TC 136, the ISO committee for furniture (https://www.iso.org/committee/52448.html), so write the required test into the RFQ and ask for the report. A sticker proves a system exists; the report proves this lock passed the cycles, and only the report belongs in a purchase order. Naming the standard turns a price-only quote into a tested quote, and it lets you reject a lock that lacks the evidence before the container is booked.

Coding is the second value the RFQ must pin. State who sets the factory code, whether the user can reset it, and the lost-code process, then hold one reference sample per finish and confirm the code in writing before volume. The oval combination lock handle CHTV01-1 and the round combination lock CHE-045 are run on in-house bodies, so the coding stays consistent order after order; a trader relaying a plant cannot promise the same code set twice. Write the coding process next to the ISO reference so both travel with the order.

Which Documents Should You Attach to a Smart Lock RFQ?

Attach three documents so the quote is not an estimate of intent. The first is the written specification sheet, copied from the smart furniture lock specification guide, with every value the supplier must meet. The second is the lock body or cam drawing, because a lock that needs a different mortise is a different product from one that drops into the existing cut-out. The third is the reference sample photo or the held sample ID, so the finish and the coding are fixed objects. A supplier quoting against all three cannot quietly substitute a mechanical lock for the electronic one you specified.

Add the destination-market requirement as a fourth attachment. A lock cleared for one market is not automatically cleared for another, so name the mark and ask the supplier to confirm it can be applied. The cabinet lock supplier questions cover the maker-vs-reseller controls for mechanical locks, and an electronic lock supplier must meet the same ones plus the coding evidence. Send the documents with the RFQ, not after the quote, so the returned price already includes the compliant build.

What Should Buyers Ask When the Smart Lock Quote Returns?

Read the returned quote against the RFQ line by line, then ask five questions. Ask whether the quoted lock matches the mechanism code you sent, whether the ISO/TC 136 test report is attached, whether the coding and reset process are the ones you specified, whether the lead time is the one you modelled, and whether the mechanism is made in-house or relayed. The smart lock supplier guide lists the maker-vs-reseller controls these answers expose, so score each supplier on the reply. A quote that dodges one question is a quote with a hidden substitution.

Ask for the right to hold the reference sample and to audit the plant, because both protect the reorder. A supplier that agrees to a held sample and a plant visit is signalling it controls the line; one that refuses is signalling it relays someone else's. Write the sample and audit rights into the purchase order that follows the RFQ, and keep the reference sample from the awarded supplier so the second container can be matched to the first. The egg drawer combination lock CHE-046 and the combination lock CHF-52 carry the same evidence requirement as every other lock, so apply the rights to all of them.

Which RFQ Mistakes Increase Smart Lock Sourcing Risk?

The mistake that fails most often is sending a photo instead of a specification. A buyer forwards a catalogue image and asks for "the same lock", and every supplier quotes a different mechanism that looks close, so the approved sample never matches the shipped container. The fix is the smart furniture lock specification guide: write the mechanism, the coding process and the ISO test as values, then require the quote to echo them. A specification-driven RFQ is the only RFQ a purchase order can be written against.

The second mistake is leaving the coding and the test blank. A quote without the ISO/TC 136 evidence and without a held reference sample is a price and nothing else, and the lock that arrives may not reset or may not be cleared for the market. The furniture hardware RFQ checklist lists the fields buyers most often leave empty, so check it against your draft before you send. Each blank is a guess the supplier fills in for you, and the guess is rarely the one your furniture line needs.

Buyer Checklist

  • Write the mechanism type and the coding or reset process into the RFQ.
  • Name the ISO/TC 136 test evidence and require the cycle-life or finish report.
  • Attach the specification sheet, the lock body drawing and a reference sample.
  • State quantity, MOQ, packaging, target-market mark and Incoterms together.
  • Ask for the right to hold a reference sample and to audit the plant.
  • Compare returned quotes line by line against the RFQ before awarding.

Conclusion

A smart lock RFQ is the document that turns a buying intent into a buyable order: list the mechanism type, the coding process, the ISO/TC 136 test evidence, the quantities and the reference sample, and every supplier quotes the same lock. Start the RFQ from a known catalogue such as the Natlo furniture locks range, attach the smart furniture lock specification you already wrote, and send the Natlo Hardware team your draft for a supplier shortlist before you award. The RFQ you write carefully is the RFQ that ships consistently from the first sample to the hundredth container.

Sources

  • ISO/TC 136 Furniture, scope including furniture hardware test methods: https://www.iso.org/committee/52448.html
  • IEC 60884-2-8, Socket-outlets for furniture, published by the International Electrotechnical Commission: https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/71934
  • Natlo Hardware furniture locks product data: https://natlohardware.com/products/furniture-locks

Časté dotazy

What is the difference between a smart lock RFQ and a specification?

The specification records the values the lock must meet; the RFQ sends those values to suppliers and asks for a price and a lead time. Write the specification first and attach it to the RFQ so suppliers quote the same lock.

Which test evidence should a smart lock RFQ require?

Require the ISO/TC 136 cycle-life or finish test report for the lock. A sticker proves a system exists; the ISO report proves this lock passed the cycles, and only the report belongs in a purchase order.

How many suppliers should a buyer RFQ for smart locks?

RFQ two or three makers, not one, so the comparison is honest and the reorder is not a single-source gamble. Score each on in-house mechanism, coding control and test evidence, then keep a reference sample from the one you award.

Should buyers specify the coding process in the RFQ?

Yes. State who sets the factory code, whether the user can reset it, and the lost-code process, so the code set stays consistent across reorders. A trader relaying a plant cannot promise the same code twice.

What should buyers check when the smart lock quote returns?

Check the quote line by line against the RFQ: mechanism code, ISO/TC 136 report, coding and reset process, lead time and in-house mechanism. A quote that dodges one question is a quote with a hidden substitution.

Jste připraveni nakupovat nábytkové kování od skutečného výrobce?

Sdělte nám svůj trh, cílové SKU a množství. Zašleme vám katalog na míru, MOQ a ceny.

Odpovíme do 24 hodinAngličtina / Španělština / RuštinaPodpora B2B nákupu
Získat nabídkuChat na WhatsApp